След screenshot, ОCR от Google и после Translate резултата е:
Цитат: From the daily conversations with our customers, we can see that many paragliders drag on the performance of a paraglider using only the information about the total line meters conclusions. That this is not necessarily so, explained in the following text Michael Nesler SWING.
Of course it is true that less line meters reduce the resistance, which is why every designer strives to obstruct as little as possible leash meters. However, bring a leash reduction with a few line attachment points and problems that can adversely affect the performance and safety.
If you want to have a clean standing profile in every situation, you can not avoid a certain number of lines. Although you can bring an insufficiently abgestütztes profile by internal tensions and stiffness back into shape, but this is very expensive in practicality and need not necessarily bring a real performance advantage. Often one sees that pure 3-liners tend at about 25 to 50% of deceleration to deform unfavorable profile in the rear area (see Fig. 1-3). This degrades the handling and climb performance. In addition, we have made in the development of the NEXUS experience that the Proto that was designed as a pure 3-liner, plummeted more at full throttle and in turbulent conditions in the performance is as the same screen, designed as a hybrid 3-liner with more total line meters. Why is that?
In accelerated flight the 3-Line version has set the leech, making the sliding was adversely affected. In addition, the rear support Linen increase stability in turbulence and thus prevent the cap works Even the modern competition HiPerformers have therefore inzwi
Re's C / D *
Even if it would be possible to reduce the line meters without og Einzuhandeln disadvantages the savings in line drag is often not as great as one might think. The reason is that the overall strength is 阿 approval of the main lines and the Galeleleinen calculated and determined. (EN-926-1, paragraph 3.2) That is, fewer lines must even after aging - bear a greater load is why we need greater diameter, the theoretical savings in drag at least partially Zunich again
|
) 
